As
part of the Technological Phenomenon trilogy, it is also important to recognize
how education has evolved. William Sugar, Associate Professor for East Carolina
University, explores teaching strategies of the traditional classroom
environment as opposed to an online forum. Online professors face different
challenges in the online environment such as a distinct set of online student
needs and the need to promote interaction in the distance learning environments
(p. 366). Sugar believes that teaching in the online environment requires
additional preparation time as well as a loss of personal interactions with
students. The research revealed mixed reviews with participants feeling some
face-to-face activities can be replicated in the online environment and some
cannot. While I believe this information to be fact, I believe we have to ask
the question of how this impacts the ability to learn and retain information.
For example, some students may prefer an online environment while others may
prefer the traditional classroom environment since they need that one-on-one
interaction with their professors and classmates. This type of analysis and
information is important as our society raises up the next generation of communication
professionals. Just as the workplace needs to keep in mind the purpose of
communication, our educational departments must continually research and
examine how technology is affecting the way students learn. How we learn is
just as important as what we learn.
One of the professions most
affected by technology is that of the journalist. How do communication professionals,
specifically journalists, use – or do not use – social media in their roles as
news gatherers and disseminators? Researchers conducted a study where 200
business journalists participated in a phone interview that included questions
on demographics, uses, and perceived value of social media (Lariscy et al,
2009). Shockingly, 34% considered social media to be of little or no importance
in their jobs and approximately 3% find the majority of their information in
online sources. The results of the study indicate that journalists embrace the concept of social media rather than
actually utilizing the practices of it. These are interesting findings
considering so much of our news is consumed through social media such as news
apps, Twitter, etc. The consensus of
those surveyed was that social media was not very important to the journalists’
overall profession. Fortunately, those conducting the research realize that
this thought process needs changing. Social media is becoming more and more
prevalent in the role of news building, and, as the authors state, journalists
would be smart to be prepared for the day social media may contribute to agenda
building. That day is already here.
In her article
entitled Online Journalists: Foundations
for Research into their Changing Roles, author Jane Singer suggests that instead of
gate-keeping disappearing with the invention of the Internet, some journalists
see this function as evolving in this new media environment and feel their
primary role is “interpreter” as opposed to “gatherers” and “disseminators.” In
contrast to the report from Lariscy et al., which states that journalists do
not engage with social media in the professional context, Singer argues that
journalists use interactive media to gather information as well as disseminate
it. This relates to the writer’s responsibility since we can now understand the
way journalists view their roles in the new media.
Lariscy,
R., Avery, E., Sweetser, K., & Howes, P. (2009). An Examination of the Role
of Online
Social Media in Journalists’
Source Mix. Public Relations Review: A
Global Journal of Research and Comment. 35: 314-316.
Singer,
J. (1998). Online Journalists: Foundations for Research into their Changing
Roles. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Volume 4, Issue 1.
Sugar,
W., Martindale, T., & Crawley, F. (2007). One Professor’s Face-to-Face
Teaching
Strategies while becoming an Online Instructor. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education. Volume 8(4), p.
365-385.
No comments:
Post a Comment